Water companies could face raft of legal challenges after landmark sewage ruling

A landmark Supreme Court judgment this week could pave the way for cleaner rivers, waterways and seas as new legal avenues open up to sue water companies for dumping sewage.

The ruling made yesterday (Tuesday 2nd July), hailed as a “sensational victory” by campaigners, follows a hearing in March 2023 over United Utilities’ attempts to avoid accountability over its sewage pollution of the Manchester Ship Canal.

The Environmental Law Foundation (ELF), backed by Good Law Project and represented by Hausfeld, brought an intervention in the hearing.

Through ELF’s intervention it was demonstrated that sewage pollution was a significant problem for river and marine communities across the country and not just the Manchester Ship Canal. The judgment sets a significant precedent that has implications far beyond the Manchester Ship Canal.

The judgment overturned two previous rulings in the High Court and Court of Appeal in favour of United Utilities, who brought legal action against the Manchester Ship Canal Company in 2018.

These previous rulings shielded United Utilities and other water companies against legal challenges from individuals and businesses affected by sewage discharges.

The latest figures published by the Environment Agency show that United Utilities has been the worst offending water company for sewage dumping since 2020. Last year the company discharged untreated sewage 97,500 times for a duration of over 650,000 hours.

Good Law Project’s interim head of legal, Jennine Walker, said:

“This is a sensational victory and a real boost to the clean up of our rivers, waterways and seas. It gives people stronger legal tools to turn the tide on the sewage scandal and hold water companies to account, after our toothless and underfunded regulators have failed to do so.

“We hope this landmark ruling empowers people and businesses to use the courts to challenge industrial-scale polluters like United Utilities, who have put profits and the shareholder interest over protecting our environment.” 

Environmental Law Foundation co-director and casework manager, Emma Montlake, said:

“This was a ‘monster case’ as characterised by lead Counsel for the Manchester Ship Canal. Enormously complex, the outcome has the potential to be a game changer for communities up and down the land.  

“Our water environments have been regularly polluted with untreated sewage, water biodiversity denuded and degraded with impunity by private water companies. A national scandal doesn’t come close to describing what we have put up with. This is a glad day for environmental justice, not just for the public, but for nature.” 

NEWS CATEGORIES

LATEST NEWS

Water companies to be forced to double compensation for failures

The Government has confirmed that water customers around the country will benefit from significantly higher payments to compensate them for water company service failures. Following public...

Scottish Water launches first online overflow map, showing near real-time data from waste water overflows

Scottish Water’s first online overflow map, showing near real-time data from waste water overflows across the country, has been launched and is now live...

Food companies ordered to pay over £265,000 for severe sewer abuse offences

Thames Water has been cracking down on sewer abuse in the food industry, with two companies ordered to pay a combined total of £262,500...

New report predicts surge in number of older people living in water poverty

Almost one million pensioner households in England and Wales could be living in water poverty by 2029/30 if the UK Government doesn’t introduce a...