Water companies could face raft of legal challenges after landmark sewage ruling

A landmark Supreme Court judgment this week could pave the way for cleaner rivers, waterways and seas as new legal avenues open up to sue water companies for dumping sewage.

The ruling made yesterday (Tuesday 2nd July), hailed as a “sensational victory” by campaigners, follows a hearing in March 2023 over United Utilities’ attempts to avoid accountability over its sewage pollution of the Manchester Ship Canal.

The Environmental Law Foundation (ELF), backed by Good Law Project and represented by Hausfeld, brought an intervention in the hearing.

Through ELF’s intervention it was demonstrated that sewage pollution was a significant problem for river and marine communities across the country and not just the Manchester Ship Canal. The judgment sets a significant precedent that has implications far beyond the Manchester Ship Canal.

The judgment overturned two previous rulings in the High Court and Court of Appeal in favour of United Utilities, who brought legal action against the Manchester Ship Canal Company in 2018.

These previous rulings shielded United Utilities and other water companies against legal challenges from individuals and businesses affected by sewage discharges.

The latest figures published by the Environment Agency show that United Utilities has been the worst offending water company for sewage dumping since 2020. Last year the company discharged untreated sewage 97,500 times for a duration of over 650,000 hours.

Good Law Project’s interim head of legal, Jennine Walker, said:

“This is a sensational victory and a real boost to the clean up of our rivers, waterways and seas. It gives people stronger legal tools to turn the tide on the sewage scandal and hold water companies to account, after our toothless and underfunded regulators have failed to do so.

“We hope this landmark ruling empowers people and businesses to use the courts to challenge industrial-scale polluters like United Utilities, who have put profits and the shareholder interest over protecting our environment.” 

Environmental Law Foundation co-director and casework manager, Emma Montlake, said:

“This was a ‘monster case’ as characterised by lead Counsel for the Manchester Ship Canal. Enormously complex, the outcome has the potential to be a game changer for communities up and down the land.  

“Our water environments have been regularly polluted with untreated sewage, water biodiversity denuded and degraded with impunity by private water companies. A national scandal doesn’t come close to describing what we have put up with. This is a glad day for environmental justice, not just for the public, but for nature.” 

NEWS CATEGORIES

LATEST NEWS

Southern Water first to face MPs in series of water companies quizzed by EFRA Committee

Southern Water is to be the first water company to appear before MPs on the EFRA Committee, who will hold the first evidence session...

Glanua acquires anaerobic digestion and biogas specialist Marches Biogas

Glanua has announced that it has acquired Marches Biogas, an engineering and services firm that specialises in anaerobic digestion and biogas production. Glanua is an...

Work progressing on Scottish Water’s largest peatland restoration project to date 

Scottish Water is restoring over 500 hectares of peatland in East Ayrshire as part of its bid to protect water quality and cut carbon...

Affinity Water joins neurodiversity in business

Affinity Water has announced it's membership in Neurodiversity in Business (NiB) - the Neurodiversity Charity, a non-profit forum dedicated to fostering neuroinclusivity in the...